Green Public Procurement Sebagai Salah Satu Implementasi SDGs Sektor Publik Kota Samarinda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70260/nij.v2i2.33Keywords:
Green Public Procurement, Pelayanan Publik, Pembangunan, BerkelanjutanAbstract
Environmentally friendly public procurement (GPP) has been widely adopted as a public administration tool to achieve sustainability outcomes. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding the determinants of Green Public Procurement adoption, namely the characteristics of the contracting authority. This research aims to analyze the extent to which Green Public Procurement is implemented in Public Sector services in Samarinda, where this is one of the absorptions of the Government’s Long Term Program, namely Sustainable Development (SDGs). This analysis uses descriptive qualitative methods with observation, interviews and empirical review methods. The results of the research show that there are challenges in the implementation of Environmentally Friendly Goods and Services Procurement, especially in regulations that have not been updated, Human Resources are still limited, Work Flow is still hampered, and Inadequate Network Devices. There is still a need for service standards and standards for the use of equipment and work equipment that support the procurement of environmentally friendly goods and services. However, basically the Implementation of Procurement of Environmentally Friendly Goods and Services in the Samarinda City Government Sector has been implemented correctly, although in several cases there are still things that need to be completed.
References
Appolloni, A., Coppola, M. A., & Piga, G. (2019). Implementation of green considerations in public procurement: a means to promote sustainable development. In Green public procurement strategies for environmental sustainability (pp. 23-44). IGI Global.
Ervianto, W. I. (2010). Implementasi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Tinjauan Pada Tahap Konstruksi. Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil Jilid 4
Lian, P. C., & Laing, A. W. (2004). Public sector purchasing of health services: A comparison with private sector purchasing. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 10(6), 247-256.
Li, L., & Geiser, K. (2005). Environmentally responsible public procurement (ERPP) and its implications for integrated product policy (IPP). Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 705-715.
Liu, J., Xue, J., Yang, L., & Shi, B. (2019). Enhancing green public procurement practices in local governments: Chinese evidence based on a new research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 842-854.
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537-542.
Nazir, M. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nemec, J., Hrušková, M., Šagát, V., & Shadrina, E. (2023). The Barriers to Green Public Procurement: Analysis of Four “Post-Socialist” Countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2245170
NL Agency. ( 2014). Criteria for the Sustainable Public Procurement of Construction Works. NL Agency
Wang, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, M., Bu, Z., & Liu, J. (2021). Green public procurement as a promoter for green consumption: From the perspective of individual’s knowledge. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100035.
Sinambela, L. P. (2006). Reformasi pelayanan publik: teori. Kebijakan dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyono, M. (2008). Penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tariq, M. I., Abbass, K., Chebbi, K., & Hussain, Y. (2023). Assessing the role of green supply chain management in enhancing Pakistan manufacturers’ performances. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dian Irma Aprianti, Sugeng Chairuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.